Rivera

Rivera v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20213:20-cv-01831California529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKEY V. RIVERA, Case No.: 20cv1831-GPC (RBM)

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. ENLARGE TIME TO SATISFY THE

FILING FEE REQUIREMENT AND

KEN CLARK, Warden,

GRANTING MOTION TO

Respondent. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 16 On September 9, 2020, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) On September 17, 2010, the Court dismissed this action because Petitioner had failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Petitioner was instructed that to have this action reopened he was required to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by November 17, 2020. (Id. at 1.) Petitioner filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on November 16, 2020. (ECF No. 3.) On November 17, 2020, the Court denied the motion because it did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.