San Diego County Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20213:18-cv-00967California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT Case No.: 18cv967-GPC(RBB)

UNION,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

Plaintiff, PARTE REQUEST FOR COURT TO v. ISSUE ORDER ON ITS MOTION TO

EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. ON

CITIZENS EQUITY FIRST CREDIT

AMIR

UNION,

16 Defendant. [Dkt. No. 272.]

18 Plaintiff filed an ex parte request for the Court to rule on its motion to exclude 19 testimony of Dr. On Amir because Defendant intends to call Dr. Amir as a witness at 20 trial. (Dkt. No. 272.) Defendant filed a response and Plaintiff replied. (Dkt. No. 274, 21 275.) 22 The Court’s prior order granted SDCCU’s motion for summary judgment declaring 23 that SDCCU’s use of the SDCCU Mark does not infringe the CEFCU Registered Mark 24 and that SDCCU’s use of the SDCCU Mark does not infringe CEFCU common law mark 25 for the CEFCU Tagline as unopposed. (Dkt. No. 259 at 21.) The Court, sua sponte, 26 dismissed the cancellation counterclaim for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.