Shaughnessy

Shaughnessy v. LVNV Funding, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20203:20-cv-01809California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRADY SHAUGHNESSY, individually Case No.: 20-cv-1809-DMS-WVG and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND Plaintiff,

GRANTING DEFENDANTS LEAVE

14 v. TO AMEND

LVNV FUNDING, LLC; RESURGENT

CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Grady Shaughnessy’s motion to strike portions of Defendants LVNV Funding, LLC, and Resurgent Capital Services, LP’s (“Defendants”) Answers to the Complaint. Defendants filed an opposition, in which they counter-moved for leave to amend, and Plaintiff filed a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendants leave to amend and denies Plaintiff’s motion to strike as moot. I. BACKGROUND On August 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a putative class action complaint in California Superior Court, alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.