Hall

Hall v. Marriott International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20213:19-cv-01715California700 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD HALL, Case No.: 19-CV-1715 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING HEARING

v. DATE ON AND GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, Inc., a

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

Delaware Corporation, AMEND COMPLAINT Defendant. 16 (ECF No. 46)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Todd Hall’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 46), as well as Defendant Marriott International, Inc.’s Non Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion (“Non-Opp’n,” ECF No. 52). The Court finds this matter appropriately decided without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and thus VACATES the hearing set for January 21, 2021. Having considered the Parties’ briefing and the law, the Court GRANTS the Motion. BACKGROUND On September 9, 2019, Plaintiff filed this putative consumer class action alleging that Defendant engages in false and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.