Salmen
Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20213:20-cv-02088California1,854 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, CDCR #BK-5881, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02088-GPC-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S
DECEMBER 18, 2020 ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
CORRECTIONS AND
TO APPOINT COUNSEL
REHABILITATION; S. ROBERTS; M.
GLYNN; J. HODGES; A. KENDALL; [Doc. No. 14]
DR. CHAU; H. FRANKLIN; S.
ANDERSON; A. SHITTU; S. GATES,
18 Defendants.
Plaintiff Justin Salmen (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the United States Constitution. See Doc. No. 7. Before the Court is a document titled “Motion for Appointment of Counsel” (the “Motion”) in which plaintiff reiterates his request to have counsel appointed and objects to the Court’s December 14, 2020 Notice of Document Discrepancy. Doc. No. 14; see also Doc. No. 10. …