Newlin

Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Newlin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20213:20-cv-00765California5,087 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Case No.: 20cv765-GPC(DEB)

OF CONNECTICUT,

ORDER GRANTING THE

Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO v. DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

ANTHONY and BLYTHE NEWLIN, as 15 individuals; QUADE & ASSOCIATES, [Dkt. Nos. 66, 67.] PLC, a California professional liability company; AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY 17 COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 20 Before the Court are Defendant AIG Property Casualty Company’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) and Defendants Anthony and Blythe Newlin, and Quade & Associates, PLC’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. Nos. 66, 67.) Plaintiff Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut filed a joint opposition to both motions. (Dkt. No. 79.) All Defendants filed their replies. (Dkt. No. 83, 84.) Based on the reasoning below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.