Raiser
Raiser v. San Diego County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 19cv751-GPC(KSC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. EX PARTE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
SAN DIEGO COUNTY, et al,
Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 91, 91-1.]
Before the Court is plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration. As outlined more fully below, this Ex Parte Motion seeks reconsideration of several prior discovery rulings. [Doc. No. 91-1.] Defendants contend plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion is duplicative and unwarranted. [Doc. No. 96, at p. 4.] For the reasons outlined more fully below, the Court finds that plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion must be DENIED. “[A] motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law. [Citation omitted.] A motion for…