Laflam

Laflam v. Colvin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20213:16-cv-01503California1,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZENAIDA SONSA LAFLAM, Case No.: 16-cv-1503-AJB-NLS Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

14 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of (Doc. No. 25) Social Security, 16 Defendant.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Zenaida Sonsa Laflam’s Counsel’s (“Counsel”) motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 406(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. No. 25.) Defendant Andrew Saul, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), neither assents nor objects to the requested fees. (Doc. No. 26.) For the reasons set forth, the Court GRANTS Counsel’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On June 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her claim for benefits. (Doc. No. 1.) Thereafter, the parties filed their respective motions for summary judgment. (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.