Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2098-L-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S RULE 56(d) MOTION

AND (2) DENYING WITHOUT

CITY OF CARLSBAD, et al.,

PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’

Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

16 [ECF Nos. 94, 86] 17 18 Pending before the Court in this action alleging police use of excessive force during arrest in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1 is Plaintiff's motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) to extend the due date for his opposition to Defendants’ pending motion for summary judgment. (Docs. no. 94 and 86, respectively.) Defendants filed an opposition. (Doc. no. 98.) For the reasons which follow, Plaintiff's motion is granted. Defendants’ summary judgment motion is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff claims Defendants violated his civil rights. (See Compl. for Damages (ECF No. 1-2…