Ingegno
Ingegno v. Pruco Life Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES PETER INGEGNO and JERRY Case No.: 20cv385-H(KSC)
HAMMOND,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART JOINT v. MOTION TO CONTINUE 14 DEADLINES [Doc. No. 33.]
THE PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
16 Defendants.
Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue Deadlines. [Doc. No. 33.] In this Joint Motion, the parties seek a continuance of all dates and deadlines in the Scheduling Order filed on November 3, 2020 [Doc. No. 31] for 60 days. There are several reasons for the request. First, the offices of plaintiffs’ counsel were closed for the holidays. Second, plaintiffs reside in Mexico and Arizona. Third, plaintiffs’ ability to complete an investigation in Mexico to check the veracity of defendant’s investigative report has been impacted by COVID-19. Fourth, plaintiffs object to conducting depositions remotely via Zoom. Fifth, plaintiffs’ counsel will be out of the office the week of…