Langer

Langer v. YM Holdings, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20213:18-cv-01114California830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS LANGER, Case No.: 18-CV-1114 JLS (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT YM HOLDINGS,

LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

YM HOLDINGS, LLC; DONG SOO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

LEE; SUJIN LEE; AND DOES 1-10,

AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 21) 17 Presently before the Court is Defendant YM Holdings, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, (“Mot.,” ECF No. 21). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the Motion. The Ninth Circuit has held that pursuant to a local rule a district court may properly grant a motion to dismiss for failure to respond. See generally Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (affirming dismissal for failure to file timely opposition papers where plaintiff had notice of the motion and ample time to respond). Here, a local rule does allow the Court to grant the Motion: Civil Local Rule 7.1.f.3.c. provides “[i]f…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.