Kernan

(PC) Riley v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20213:16-cv-00405California723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN E. RILEY, Case No.: 16cv405-MMA-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR HEARING

S KERNAN, et al.,

DATE AND TIME FOR MOTION TO

Defendants. COMPEL, AND

16 (2) ORDERING MEET AND CONFER

18 [ECF No. 81] 19 Presently before the Court is an application from Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, seeking a hearing date and time for a motion to compel. ECF No. 81. The Court finds no indication in the one-sentence request that Plaintiff has met and conferred with defense counsel in a good faith effort to resolve any discovery disputes prior to seeking the Court’s intervention. See id. The Scheduling Order issued on August 21, 2020 states the following: / / / / / / / / / Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.