Strojnik

Strojnik v. Village 1017 Coronado, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20213:19-cv-02210California2,995 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PETER STROJNIK, SR., Case No. 19-cv-02210-BAS-MSB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES v. (ECF No. 17) 1017 CORONADO, INC., 12 Defendant. 13 On November 20, 2019, Peter Strojnik, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the California Unruh Act, the California Disabled Persons Act (“DPA”) and one count of negligence. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On June 16, 2020, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of standing. (ECF No. 15.) Defendant now moves for Attorney’s Fees or in the Alternative for Sanctions (“Motion”). (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff objects to the Motion (ECF No. 19), and Defendant replies to the objection. (ECF No. 20.) The Court finds this Motion is suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. LR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.