Haynes

Haynes v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20213:19-cv-02380California1,431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERMAN HAYNES, Case No.: 19cv02380-BAS (MSB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

H. ASBURY, et al., [ECF No. 25] Defendants. 16 On January 7, 2021, Plaintiff Herman Haynes (“Plaintiff”) submitted “Plaintiff Request for Appointed Counsel” (“Motion for Appointment of Counsel”), which the Court accepted on discrepancy on January 11, 2021. (See ECF Nos. 24 and 25.) Plaintiff requests counsel “to assist with the remainder of the case.” (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff’s sole argument in support of his request is that, as a result of COVID-19, he currently has “minimum to no access to the Law Library at the Facility due to constant lockdowns and unit quarantines for exposure precautions.” (Id.) I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.