Fu

Fu v. Yang

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20213:20-cv-02050California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 XIANG-DONG FU, an individual, Case No.: 20-CV-2050 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED

MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION

ZHI YANG, an individual; BVCF

AND (2) DENYING PENDING

MANAGEMENT, LTD.;

MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CUREPHARMA LTD.;

KUREPHARMA, LTD.; and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF (ECF Nos. 12, 14, 32, 33, 39, 41, 51, 54,

CALIFORNIA,

56, 57, 60) 18 Defendants. 19 Presently before the Court is Defendants Zhi Yang; BVCF Management, Ltd.; Curepharma, Ltd.; and Kurepharma, Ltd.’s Emergency Motion to Stay Proceeding Pending Resolution of the Hong Kong Court Proceeding (ECF No. 57). Plaintiff Xiang-Dong Fu did not file an opposition to the Motion. See generally Docket. The Parties filed a Joint Stipulation, under order of the Hong Kong court, on January 15, 2021 (ECF No. 59). The Parties stipulated “that the time for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.