In Re: Easysaver Rewards Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20213:09-cv-02094California2,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 IN RE EASYSAVER REWARDS Case No. 09-cv-02094-BAS-WVG

LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING OBJECTOR’S

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

AND INCENTIVE AWARD

16 (ECF No. 368) 17 18

Presently before the Court is Objector Brian Perryman’s motion seeking $805,000 in attorney’s fees and a $2,500 incentive award. (ECF No. 368.) Plaintiffs briefly respond. (ECF No. 370.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Objector’s motion. I. BACKGROUND The Court chronicled this action’s lengthy history in its last order. (ECF No. 367 at 2:1–17:9.) Relevant here, this case is a consumer class action where the Court approved a settlement with two components. First, the settlement provided for class members to receive credits with a total face value of $25.5 million. Second, the settlement established a $12.5 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.