Davall
Davall v. Cordero
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DAVALL, CDCR #AW-8294, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL
A. CORDERO; D. WHITE; WHITMAN, [Doc. No. 19] Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Joseph Davall (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the United States Constitution. See Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 19. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND On October 5, 2020, plaintiff filed this action, alleging that defendants violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Doc. No. at 3-5. On November 5, 2020, the District Court, having conducted…