Bonilla

Bonilla v. Meza

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20213:20-cv-02266California1,570 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-2266-DMS-LL

CDCR #J-48500,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) JUDGE AMALIA L. MEZA, et al., [ECF No. 16] Defendants. AND

18 2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C.

20 § 1914(a)

22 23 24 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison has filed a civil action. On November 24, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) and/or to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a) and granted Plaintiff thirty days leave in which to pay the filing fee or file a complete motion to proceed IFP. (See ECF No. 2, at 2-3.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.