D.C.
D.C. v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D.C., a minor by and through his Case No.: 15-cv-1868-MMA (NLS) Guardian Ad Litem, Helen Garter,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A Plaintiff, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. [Doc. No. 108] COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16
18 On August 24, 2015, Plaintiff, a minor, initiated this putative class action by and through his guardian ad litem pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging Defendant County of San Diego (the “County”) violated his and the putative class’ constitutional rights. See Doc. No. 1. On November 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. See Doc. No. 108. The County filed an opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. See Doc. Nos. 109, 113. With leave of the Court, the County filed a sur-reply, and Plaintiff responded. See Doc. Nos. 118, 122. The Court found the matter suitable for disposition on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b)…