Yanez

Williams v. Yanez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20213:20-cv-00738California591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNATHON WILLIAMS, Case No.: 20cv738-CAB-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 16] YANEZ, YOUNG, Defendant. 16 On September 15, 2020, Defendants E. Yanez and A. Young filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. [Doc. No. 16.] More than four months have passed, and Plaintiff Johnathon Williams has not filed an opposition. Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2. requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within fourteen calendar days of the noticed hearing. Failure to comply with these rules “may constitute a consent to the granting of a motion.” Civ. Local R. 7.1.f.3.c. District courts have broad discretion to enact and apply local rules, including dismissal of a case for failure to comply with the local rules. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir.1995) (affirming grant of an unopposed motion to dismiss under local rule by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.