Sekerke

Sekerke v. Hoodenpyle

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20213:19-cv-00035California6,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE , Case No.: 19-cv-00035-WQH (JLB)

REPORT AND Plaintiff,

RECOMMENDATION RE:

13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST HOODENPYLE, et al.,

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. [ECF No. 30] 17 18 Plaintiff Keith Wayne Sekerke (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner formerly incarcerated at the Vista Detention Facility and currently incarcerated at the San Diego Central Jail, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1; 3; 28 (“FAC”).) Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint in this matter on April 9, 2020 against San Diego County Sheriff’s Deputies Joshua Hoodenpyle (“Hoodenpyle”), Pablo Reyes (“Reyes”), Jeffrey Burns (“Burns”), Jianna D’Agostino (“D’Agostino”), Miguel Angulo (“Angulo”), Brittany Stubbs (“Stubbs”), and the County of San Diego (“County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.