Hill

Hill v. Alpine Sherriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20213:18-cv-02470California3,127 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PERCY HILL also known as Case No.: 18cv2470-CAB-MDD

PERCY EDWIN STOCKTON,

REPORT AND

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION GRANTING v. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR

TERMINATING SANCTIONS

ALPINE SHERIFF

14 DEPARTMENT, et al., [ECF No. 69] Defendants. 16 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court RECOMMENDS Defendants’ motion for terminating sanctions1 be GRANTED and this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 24 25 1 Defendants caption their motion as a motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 41(b), or alternatively to compel Plaintiff to be deposed. Based on the substance of Defendants’ I. INTRODUCTION Percy Hill (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.