Fellner

Highlander Holdings, Inc. v. Fellner

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20213:18-cv-01506California1,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HIGHLANDER HOLDINGS, INC., Case No.: 3:18-cv-1506-AHG-LL

Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

v. JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE

THE DEPOSITION OF ANDREW

ANDREW FELLNER, et al.,

FELLNER, THE TRIAL DATE, AND

Defendants. ALL APPLICABLE DATES

ASSOCIATED THEREWITH

[ECF No. 89]

18 On January 15, 2021, the parties filed a joint motion to continue certain dates in this 19 case. ECF No. 89. Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for 20 good cause and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that 21 has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon 22 Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on 23 the diligence of the party seeking to amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking 24 modification. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.