Musgrove

Musgrove v. Hanifin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20213:20-cv-00614California1,888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 IRVIN MUSGROVE Case No.: 20-cv-00614-GPC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING THE FOURTH

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT

ANGIE HANIFIN, SUSANA SOTO, TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

MARGERY PIERCE, KEYSA

MACHADO, AND OCEANSIDE

[ECF No. 16.] HOUSING AUTHORITY Defendants. 17 On March 31, 2020 Plaintiff Irvin Musgrove, proceeding pro se, initiated this action. ECF No. 1. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. Plaintiff sent Defendant Keysa Machado, identified as Supervisor of Oceanside Housing Authority, a request for waiver of service of summons. ECF No. 1 at 6. On May 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint naming Angie Hanifin, Susana Soto, and Oceanside Housing Authority as Defendants. ECF No. 7. On May 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint naming Angie Hanifin, Susana…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.