Gruder

Gruder v. Crisp Marketing, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20213:20-cv-00796California1,987 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT GRUDER, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00796-BEN-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND BOOMSOURCING, LLC, et al.,

DENYING IN PART JOINT MOTION

Defendants. TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES; and

(2) ENTERING AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 28]

20 This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion to Extend Discovery 21 Deadlines, filed on January 22, 2021. ECF No. 28. The parties seek an eight-month 22 extension of all discovery deadlines in the case in light of Plaintiff’s recent filing of an 23 Amended Complaint on January 4, 2021, newly naming Boomsourcing, LLC as a 24 Defendant, followed by Plaintiff’s dismissal of the originally named defendant Crisp 25 Marketing, LLC. See id.; see also ECF Nos. 23, 25, 26. 26 Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause 27 and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.