Kamal

Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20213:18-cv-01298California672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YOUSSIF KAMAL, GILLIAN NEELY, Case No.: 18-CV-1298 TWR (AGS)

RICHARD LICHTEN, SUSAN COX,

NICK TOVAR, MICHELE KINMAN, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

ASHLEY PETEFISH, and TERRI PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION BROWN, on their own behalf and on TO FILE DOCUMENTS 14 behalf of all others similarly situated, CONDITIONALLY UNDER SEAL 15 Plaintiffs, (ECF Nos. 80, 81) 16 v. 17 EDEN CREAMERY, LLC, dba HALO TOP CREAMERY, and JUSTIN T.

WOOLVERTON,

19 Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Youssif Kamal, Gillian Neely, Richard Lichten, Susan Cox, Nick Tovar, Michele Kinman, Ashley Petefish, and Terri Brown’s Motion to File Documents Conditionally Under Seal (“Mot.,” ECF No. 80). Plaintiffs seek to file under seal the following documents filed in support of their Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 82): portions of Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Class Certification and Exhibit A to the Declaration of Andrew J. Brown in Support of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.