McCurley

McCurley v. Royal Seas Cruises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20213:17-cv-00986California5,298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MCCURLEY and DAN Case No. 17-cv-00986-BAS-AGS DEFOREST, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER: 12 Plaintiffs, (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S AMENDED MOTION FOR v.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(ECF No. 165);

ROYAL SEA CRUISES, INC.,

AND Defendant. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(ECF No. 160) 18 Plaintiffs bring a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiffs’ MSJ”) (ECF No. 160), which Defendant opposes (ECF No. 176) and Plaintiffs reply (ECF No. 181). Defendant brings an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s MSJ”) (ECF No. 165), which Plaintiffs oppose (ECF No. 175) and Defendant replies (ECF No. 183). The Court held oral argument on both motions on January 27, 2021. Based on the papers filed and the oral arguments of the parties, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.