Oppedisano
Vaught IV v. Oppedisano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELBERT LEE VAUGHT IV, Case No. 3:20-cv-1500-MMA-RBB
CDCR #H-56089,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
ALBERT OPPEDISANO; JOHN DOE;
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
CHRISTOPHER HOEFT; GEORGE
AND § 1915A(b); AND BAKERJIAN,
Defendants. (2) DISMISSING FOR FAILING
TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE
WITH COURT ORDER
REQUIRING AMENDMENT 20 21 22 Plaintiff Elbert Lee Vaught IV, while housed at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 4, 2020. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. I. Procedural History On September 30, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed his Complaint for failing to state any claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b).…