Oppedisano

Vaught IV v. Oppedisano

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20213:20-cv-01500California433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELBERT LEE VAUGHT IV, Case No. 3:20-cv-1500-MMA-RBB

CDCR #H-56089,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

ALBERT OPPEDISANO; JOHN DOE;

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

CHRISTOPHER HOEFT; GEORGE

AND § 1915A(b); AND BAKERJIAN,

Defendants. (2) DISMISSING FOR FAILING

TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

WITH COURT ORDER

REQUIRING AMENDMENT 20 21 22 Plaintiff Elbert Lee Vaught IV, while housed at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 4, 2020. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. I. Procedural History On September 30, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed his Complaint for failing to state any claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.