Shalaby
Shalaby v. Bernzomatic
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW SHALABY, Case No.: 3:11-cv-00068-AJB-DHB Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO AMEND COURT’S BERNZOMATIC, et al., ORDER 14 Defendants. (Doc. No. 167)
16 Andrew Shalaby (“Plaintiff”) seeks to file a “motion to amend sanction order, Doc. No. 161, re omitted Rule 11 argument” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 (“Rule 59”). The Court will treat this Rule 59 motion as a motion for reconsideration. For the reasons detailed below, the motion is DENIED.1 I. LEGAL STANDARD Motions for reconsideration should not be frequently made or freely granted. See generally Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338, 1341 (9th Cir. 1981). “[T]he major grounds that justify reconsideration involve an intervening change of
26 1 Although Plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s orders before he filed the instant motion, the Ninth Circuit has stated…