Lacey
Lacey v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARIUS LACEY, Case No. 21-cv-0107-BAS-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING MOTION FOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
Defendants. FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 3);
(2) DENYING MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF
18 No. 2); AND 19 (3) DISMISSING ACTION UNDER 20 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 21
Plaintiff Darius Lacey is proceeding pro se—without an attorney. He filed a complaint on January 20, 2021, against the State of California and “George Bailey (Bankers).” (ECF No. 1.) In his three-page complaint, Plaintiff raises incomprehensible allegations about certain human trafficking operations in San Diego and Los Angeles, being poisoned while incarcerated at the George F. Bailey Detention Facility in San Diego, 28 and his inability to access his benefits. Id. Plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a motion for…