Slater

Slater v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20213:20-cv-01897California3,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD K. SLATER, an individual, ) Case No.: 3:20-cv-01897-BEN-RBB ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART v. ) PLAINITFF’S MOTION FOR ) LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.; ) COMPLAINT DOES 1-10, inclusive, ) Defendant. ) [ECF Nos. 7, 8, 9] 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Todd K. Slater, an individual (“Plaintiff”) brings this action for unpaid wages against Defendant Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“Defendant”). ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint. Motion, ECF No. 7. Defendant opposed. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff replied. ECF No. 9. The motions were submitted on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and Rule 78(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 10. After considering the papers submitted, supporting documentation, and applicable law, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.