United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Just Construction, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR Case No.: 19cv1753 JM (KSC)
THE USE AND BENEFIT OF JUST
CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
13 Plaintiff,
14 v. ORDER ON MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC.; and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY,
17 Defendants,
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
20 21 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Just Construction, Inc. (“JCI”) move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) for an order that Defendant and Counterclaimant K.O.O. Construction, Inc. (“KOO”) provide a more definite statement in its First Amended Counterclaim. (Doc. No. 50.) The court finds the motion suitable for submission without further briefing or oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the below reasons, the motion is DENIED. 28 I. BACKGROUND As stated in this court’s previous order, KOO is a government contractor that entered into a subcontract with JCI to install a concrete slab on…