United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Just Construction, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR Case No.: 19cv1753 JM (KSC)
THE USE AND BENEFIT OF JUST
12
CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
13 Plaintiff,
14 v. ORDER ON MOTION FOR MORE 15 DEFINITE STATEMENT K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC.; and 16 GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY,
17 Defendants, 18
19
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
20 21 22 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Just Construction, Inc. (“JCI”) move under Federal 23 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) for an order that Defendant and Counterclaimant K.O.O. 24 Construction, Inc. (“KOO”) provide a more definite statement in its First Amended 25 Counterclaim. (Doc. No. 50.) The court finds the motion suitable for submission without 26 further briefing or oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the 27 below reasons, the motion is DENIED. 28 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 As stated in this court’s previous order, KOO is a government contractor that 3 entered into a subcontract with JCI to install a concrete slab on…