Moran
Moran v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFONSO and ARLENE MORAN, Case No.: 3:17-cv-02594-GPC-AHG individually and on behalf of a class of 12 similarly situated individuals, AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiffs,
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
14 v. [ECF No. 82]
FCA US LLC,
16 Defendant.
18 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Order 19 Continuing Pretrial Deadlines. ECF No. 82. 20 Parties seeking to modify a scheduling order must show good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. 21 P 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s 22 consent”). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across 23 procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 24 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party seeking to 25 amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking modification. Johnson v. Mammoth 26 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d…