Sargent v. Southern California Edison 401(k) Savings Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20213:20-cv-01296California6,980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILISSA ANN SARGENT, Case No. 20-cv-1296-MMA (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

401(k) SAVINGS PLAN, et al., [Doc. No. 18] Defendants. 16 17 Milissa Ann Sargent (“Plaintiff”) seeks relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendants Edison 401(k) Savings Plan (“Plan”), Southern California Edison Company Benefits Committee (“Committee”), Plan Administrator of the Edison 401(k) Savings Plan (“Plan Administrator”), and Southern California Edison Company (“Company” or “SEC”) (collectively, “Defendants”)2 move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal 24 25 1 All citations to electronically filed documents refer to the pagination assigned by the CM/ECF system. 26 2 Plaintiff refers to several of these Defendant-entities using slightly different names. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.