Diakite

Diakite v. Poladian

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20213:19-cv-01341California1,732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMADOU DIAKITE, Case No.: 19cv1341-DMS(MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO M. POLADIAN, et al.,

MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants. [ECF NO. 68]

AND

17 (2) ISSUING AMENDED SCHEDULING

ORDER REGULATING DISCOVERY

AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS 20 On January 29, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order.” (ECF No. 68.) They ask the Court to continue their deadlines to bring a motion to compel and the deadline for filing pretrial motions by approximately thirty days. (Id. at 1-2.) In support, the parties state that Plaintiff is housed in Administrative Segregation, has minimal library access, and is scheduled to be transferred to a different prison. (Id. at 1.) They further assert that during the transfer, Plaintiff would not have access to his legal materials. (Id.) The parties contend that the requested continuance motions. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.