Mendell

Mendell v. American Medical Response, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20213:19-cv-01227California3,412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MENDELL, Case No. 19-cv-01227-BAS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE,

MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE

INC.,

(ECF No. 70); AND Defendant. 16 (2) PERMITTING SUR-REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

CERTIFY CLASS

19 Plaintiff Michael Mendell brought this putative class action for damages and 20 injunctive relief against Defendant American Medical Response, Inc. (AMR), alleging that 21 AMR made unauthorized recordings of conversations with Plaintiff and putative class 22 members without providing notification or warning required under the California Invasion 23 of Privacy Act (CIPA), Cal. Penal Code §§ 630 et seq. AMR moves to strike the 24 declarations of Mendell’s counsel and expert witness, which Mendell filed in support of 25 his reply to the motion to certify class. (ECF No. 70.) For the following reasons, the Court 26 DENIES AMR’s motion but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.