Davis

Davis v. Saidro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20213:18-cv-02838California4,726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNELL DAVIS, Case No.: 18-CV-2838-LAB(WVG)

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SAIDRO et al.,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. [Doc. No. 12.] 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the Complaint’s sole claim for violation of the Eighth Amendment. As explained below, this Court RECOMMENDS the motion be GRANTED, that judgment be entered in Defendants’ favor, and that the case be closed. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. STATEMENTS OF FACTS A. Defendants’ Statement of Facts1 On October 2, 2013, Plaintiff was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in his lower right leg. DVT is the formation of a blood clot in a deep vein. DVT may cause symptoms such as pain and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.