Platt

Platt v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20213:19-cv-00956-JLBCalifornia1,492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARI P., Case No.: 19-cv-00956-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR AWARD OF EAJA

ATTORNEY’S FEES

ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner

of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

[ECF No. 18]

18 Before the Court is the parties’ Motion with Joint Stipulation for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (ECF No. 18.) The parties seek the Court’s approval of their stipulation to award Plaintiff $7,500 in attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). For the reasons discussed below, the parties’ joint motion is GRANTED. ///

26 The Court construes the parties’ “motion with joint stipulation” as a joint motion. 27 See CivLR 7.2.b. (“Any stipulation for which court approval is sought must be first filed as a ‘joint motion.’”). I. BACKGROUND On May…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.