Omidi
Omidi v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MOJDEH OMIDI and AURORA Case No.: 14cv00857 JAH-BLM TELLERIA, individually and on behalf of 11 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiff,
MOTIONS TO DISMISS
13 v. [Doc. Nos. 59, 60]
WAL-MART STORES, INC., A
Delaware corporation, et. al., Defendant. 17 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Defendant FirstSight Vision Services’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 59) and Walmart, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 60) the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6), 9(b) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs oppose the motions. After a thorough review of the parties’ submissions and for the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motions. LEGAL STANDARDS I. Rule 12(b)(6) Defendants seek…