Conway
Conway v. San Diego Sheriff's Office
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20213:20-cv-02418California3,372 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE CONWAY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02418-GPC-BGS Booking #19706874,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S OFFICE;
[ECF No. 2]
GEORGE BAILEY DETENTION
FACILITY; A. APEZ; MICHAEL R.
AND
BARNETT; OFFICER McDONALD, 17 Defendants. 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR
FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 20 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 21 Joe Conway (“Plaintiff”), while incarcerated at the San Diego County Sheriff Department’s George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). I. …