Stark

Stark v. GG Homes, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20213:20-cv-01913California606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COLLETTE STARK, an individual, Case No.: 20cv1913-JAH

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

GG HOMES, INC., a California

STRIKE; AND

corporation, and PAUL GREEN, an (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ individual,

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

15 Defendant. [Doc. No. 38]

17 Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 12(b)(6). See Doc. No. 32. Plaintiff filed a response and opposition to the 19 motion. See Doc. No. 35. Defendants now move to Strike Plaintiff’s response and 20 opposition to its Motion to Dismiss and for Sanctions. See Doc. No. 38. 21 A party may move to strike from a pleading “an insufficient defense or any 22 redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). “[T]he 23 function of a 12(f) motion to strike is to avoid the expenditure of time and money that must 24 arise from litigating spurious issues by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.