Barto

Barto v. Miyashiro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20213:19-cv-02261California2,509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JILANNE D. BARTO, an individual, Case No.: 19cv2261-WQH(KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE JOINT MOTION

v. ADDRESSING ALLEGATION OF

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

DAVID MIYASHIRO, in his official

capacity as superintendent, CAJON [Doc. No. 32.]

VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT,

et al.,

Defendants.

19 The parties have filed a Joint Motion seeking the Court’s direction about strongly worded objections made by plaintiff’s counsel during plaintiff’s deposition, including the following, that caused defendant’s counsel to suspend the deposition: “I'm going to interpose a continuing objection to you acting as legal counsel, deposing [plaintiff], now that I've heard you over the two hours because you were her legal counsel. I have a continuing objection because you clearly have a conflict of interest and duty of loyalty and confidentiality to [plaintiff] that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.