Anaya
Anaya v. Munoz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL RIVERA ANAYA, Case No. 20-cv-01092-BAS-BGS Reg. No. 93169298,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
Plaintiff, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v. B. MUNOZ; DUSTIN R. WILLS;
SMOUSE; GENO; K. KELLER,
14 Defendants. 15 On June 15, 2020, Plaintiff commenced this action against several U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents for violations of his civil rights. (ECF No. 1.) Despite being allowed to proceed with his case on July 14, 2020, Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court, demonstrated that service on Defendants has been completed, or otherwise complied with the Court’s orders in this case. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed below, the Court exercises its inherent authority to dismiss Plaintiff’s action. I. BACKGROUND As part of its July 14, 2020 Screening Order, the Court instructed Plaintiff to complete the USM Form 285s with Defendants’ information and return them to the U.S. Marshals, who were directed to complete service. (Screening…