Anaya

Anaya v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20213:20-cv-01092California2,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL RIVERA ANAYA, Case No. 20-cv-01092-BAS-BGS Reg. No. 93169298,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. B. MUNOZ; DUSTIN R. WILLS;

SMOUSE; GENO; K. KELLER,

14 Defendants. 15 On June 15, 2020, Plaintiff commenced this action against several U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents for violations of his civil rights. (ECF No. 1.) Despite being allowed to proceed with his case on July 14, 2020, Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court, demonstrated that service on Defendants has been completed, or otherwise complied with the Court’s orders in this case. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed below, the Court exercises its inherent authority to dismiss Plaintiff’s action. I. BACKGROUND As part of its July 14, 2020 Screening Order, the Court instructed Plaintiff to complete the USM Form 285s with Defendants’ information and return them to the U.S. Marshals, who were directed to complete service. (Screening…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.