Alvarez

Alvarez v. LaRose

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20213:20-cv-00782California1,268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACINTO VICTOR ALVAREZ, JOSEPH Case No.: 20-cv-00782-DMS (AHG)

BRODERICK, MARLENE CANO, JOSE

CRESPO-VENEGAS, NOE ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

GONZALEZ-SOTO, VICTOR LARA- MOTION TO DENY PETITION FOR

SOTO, RACQUEL RAMCHARAN, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND

GEORGE RIDLEY, MICHAEL JAMIL INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY

SMITH, LEOPOLDO SZURGOT, JANE RELIEF DOE, on behalf of themselves and those 16 similarly situated, 17 Plaintiffs-Petitioners, 18 v. 19 CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, et al., 21 Defendants-Respondents. 22 23 This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus and injunctive and declaratory relief. In a November 18, 2020 Order, the Court construed the motion as one to dismiss, and ordered the parties to complete briefing on the motion, which they have done. For the reasons set out below, the motion is denied. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.