Atherley

Atherley v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20213:19-cv-02355California10,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDLY A. ATHERLEY, II, Case No.: 3:19-cv-02355-LAB-DEB

CDCR #AY-8220,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) SCREENING AND DIRECTING

U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., SERVICE OF AMENDED Defendants. COMPLAINT UPON DEFENDANTS

HULTZ, JARAMILLO, STRONG,

PAMPLIN, CRESPO AND JOYNER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) 18 AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) [ECF No. 10]

AND

21 2) DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST

REMAINING DEFENDANTS

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND § 1915A(b) 24 25 Currently before the Court and subject to initial screening is a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 10) filed by Plaintiff Edly A. Atherley, II, a prisoner at Mule Creek State Prison. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), but upon initial review, the Court found his original Complaint, which named more than two dozen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.