Romero

Romero v. Monterey Financial Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20213:19-cv-01781California6,822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES ROMERO, Case No.: 19cv1781 JM (KSC)

Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

MONTEREY FINANCIAL SERVICES,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LLC; and EQUIFAX INFORMATION

SERVICES, LLC,

16 Defendants. 17

Defendant Monterey Financial Services, LLC (“Monterey”) moves for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 44.) Plaintiff also moves for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 56.) The motions have been briefed and the court finds them suitable for submission without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the below reasons, the motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED N PART. 24 25 Defendant Equifax Financial Services, LLC (“Equifax”) also moved for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 54.) On December 4, 2020, however, Plaintiff filed notice that his claims against Equifax were resolved, and his only active claims are against Monterey. 28 I. BACKGROUND The parties do not dispute the following facts. Monterey is in the business of 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.