Paul

Johnson v. Paul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20213:20-cv-02174California822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CLARANCE D. JOHNSON, Case No.: 20-CV-2174-JLS (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. AMEND OR VACATE JUDGMENT

POPE FRANCIS PAUL, et al., (ECF No. 18) Defendants.

15 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Clarance D. Johnson’s Motion to Amend or Vacate Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 18). The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s initial complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 9.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint that addressed the deficiencies identified by the Court. (Id.) When Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, the Court converted the dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint into a dismissal of Plaintiff’s entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff requests the Court vacate or amend its January 5, 2021 Order dismissing Plaintiff’s action. (Mot. at 1.) For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.