Arellano, Jr. v. San Diego, County of

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20213:14-cv-02404California627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, JR., Case No.: 3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO KNOW IF SERVICE TO THE

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL IS

SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF, et al.,

NECESSARY

Defendants. [Doc. No. 195]

Presently before the Court is a document titled “Motion to Know If Service to U.S. Attorney General Is Necessary?” (the “Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 195. On January 6, 2021, the Court granted plaintiff’s “Motion for Address” and provided plaintiff the mailing address of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California. Doc. No. 193. In that Order, the Court recited the requirements for service on the United States as set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). Id. at 2. Plaintiff requests in the instant Motion that the Court advise him whether he is required to serve his Complaint on the United States Attorney General pursuant to that Rule. Doc. No. 195. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.