Kernan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN E. RILEY, Case No.: 16cv405-MMA-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S S. KERNAN, et al.,

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

Defendants. COUNSEL [ECF No. 87];

(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR HEARING DATE

AND TIME FOR NINETY-DAY

EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY [ECF No. 89] 20 21 Presently before the Court are two motions from Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 87, 89. Plaintiff’s first motion, filed nunc pro tunc on January 29, 2021, seeks appointment of counsel. ECF No. 87. Plaintiff’s second motion, filed nunc pro tunc on January 29, 2021, is a request for a hearing date and time for a ninety-day extension of discovery. ECF No. 89. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel and DENIES as moot Plaintiff’s Request for a Hearing Date…