Dorado
Dorado v. Crumb
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DORADO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1936-JAH-LL Booking No. 19778496,
ORDER
Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(ECF No. 10) CATHERINE CRUMB, Detective; JOHN 16 SULLIVAN, Detective; JESSICA AND COTTO, Deputy District Attorney; MARA ELLIOT, San Diego City 2) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED 18 Attorney; GREG COX, Board of COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 Supervisors , U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. Defendants. § 1915A(b) 21 Daniel Dorado (“Plaintiff”), incarcerated at the George Bailey Detention Facility (GBDF”) in San Diego, California, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) Before the Court could conduct the
26 1 According to the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department’s website, Plaintiff was last booked on December 20, 2019, has been sentenced, but has not yet been …